Piston filling
Often considered for liquids, sauces, gels and creams where measured volume and product feed suit the route.
Piston and peristaltic filling routes can both suit liquid projects, but they solve different problems. The decision is usually driven by viscosity, cleaning route, tubing contact and fill volume.

Piston filling uses a measured chamber, while peristaltic filling moves product through tubing. Each route has strengths and limitations.
Use these points to compare realistic filler routes before asking for a formal quote.
Often considered for liquids, sauces, gels and creams where measured volume and product feed suit the route.
Often considered for lower-viscosity liquids where tubing contact or changeover is useful.
Product trials or a detailed review prevent choosing a route that looks right but fills poorly.
These pages cover adjacent product types, filling routes and line-integration decisions.
Piston vs peristaltic filling is normally assessed against the real product, container and throughput target. Viscosity, foam, particulates, fill range and cleaning expectations decide whether piston, pump, peristaltic, cup or another filling route is the best shortlist.
The most useful details are product type, fill volume, container size and photos, target output, available space, utilities and any capping, labelling, coding or conveyor requirements.
Yes. Where suitable, filling can be planned with conveyors, capping, labelling, coding, sealing, accumulation and operator access as part of one production process.
Start with product testing or a detailed product review. The wrong dosing principle can create dripping, foaming, poor accuracy, slow changeover or cleaning problems.
Send your product, fill volume, container, throughput target and any downstream equipment needed. Lancing UK will narrow the most practical filling route before quotation.