Single head
Flexible and simple for lower output or frequent changeovers.
Single-head filling can be flexible and lower cost, while multi-head filling increases output when the wider process can keep pace. The right choice depends on target throughput and line balance.

The number of filling heads should be calculated from real fill time, container handling, capping speed and changeover needs rather than catalogue assumptions.
Use these points to compare realistic filler routes before asking for a formal quote.
Flexible and simple for lower output or frequent changeovers.
Better for repeat production where line speed justifies extra complexity.
Head count should follow output, accuracy and whole-line balance.
These pages cover adjacent product types, filling routes and line-integration decisions.
Single head vs multi head filling machine is normally assessed against the real product, container and throughput target. Viscosity, foam, particulates, fill range and cleaning expectations decide whether piston, pump, peristaltic, cup or another filling route is the best shortlist.
The most useful details are product type, fill volume, container size and photos, target output, available space, utilities and any capping, labelling, coding or conveyor requirements.
Yes. Where suitable, filling can be planned with conveyors, capping, labelling, coding, sealing, accumulation and operator access as part of one production process.
Start with product testing or a detailed product review. The wrong dosing principle can create dripping, foaming, poor accuracy, slow changeover or cleaning problems.
Send your product, fill volume, container, throughput target and any downstream equipment needed. Lancing UK will narrow the most practical filling route before quotation.