Volumetric cup
Often useful for free-flowing, consistent granules.
Dry product filling depends on flow, density and accuracy expectations. Volumetric cup, auger and weigh routes solve different problems, so the product should be reviewed before quotation.

Free-flowing granules may suit cup dosing, while powders and less consistent products may need auger or weigh-based comparison.
Use these points to compare realistic filler routes before asking for a formal quote.
Often useful for free-flowing, consistent granules.
Often compared for powders where screw dosing gives better control.
Useful when target weight accuracy is more important than simple volumetric speed.
These pages cover adjacent product types, filling routes and line-integration decisions.
Volumetric vs auger filling is normally assessed against the real product, container and throughput target. Viscosity, foam, particulates, fill range and cleaning expectations decide whether piston, pump, peristaltic, cup or another filling route is the best shortlist.
The most useful details are product type, fill volume, container size and photos, target output, available space, utilities and any capping, labelling, coding or conveyor requirements.
Yes. Where suitable, filling can be planned with conveyors, capping, labelling, coding, sealing, accumulation and operator access as part of one production process.
Start with product testing or a detailed product review. The wrong dosing principle can create dripping, foaming, poor accuracy, slow changeover or cleaning problems.
Send your product, fill volume, container, throughput target and any downstream equipment needed. Lancing UK will narrow the most practical filling route before quotation.