Head count
Choose two or four heads from the required accepted output, product refill time, container indexing and downstream capacity. Head count alone is not a speed calculation.
Lancing model configuration
LUDTHSP2 compact automatic volumetric filler with two to four heads.
The LUDTHSP2 is a compact conveyorised piston filler published with two filling heads and the option to configure four. It is intended for liquids and pumpable viscous products where a smaller automatic platform, touchscreen setup and multi-head dosing are required. Published speed and accuracy remain reference values until the product, dose and bottle have been tested together.
LUDTHSP22–4 headsCompact automaticPiston filler
Published reference data
Reference specification for the LUDTHSP2 configuration.
The table below paraphrases current first-party Lancing information. It is a starting point for a product-and-pack trial, not an unconditional performance guarantee.
| Specification item | Published reference |
|---|---|
| Dosing method | Piston volumetric filling |
| Published head configuration | 2 heads; customisable to 4 |
| Published volume modules | 5–100 / 10–300 / 50–500 / 100–1000 / 500–3000 / 1000–5000 ml |
| Published working speed | Approximately 10–30 bottles/min, dependent on dose and bottle size |
| Published filling accuracy | ≤ ±1% |
| Power supply | 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz |
| Power | Approximately 400 W |
| Air pressure | 0.4–0.6 MPa |
| Reference nozzle | OD 10 mm; alternatives available |
| Machine size | Approximately 1270 × 1030 × 1200 mm |
| Machine weight | Approximately 112 kg |
Source and qualification
Reference data is based on the Lancing Liquid Fillers LUDTHSP2 source page. Final construction, utilities, output and acceptance criteria must be confirmed in the Lancing quotation and trial record for the actual product and container.
Selection checks
How to turn the published configuration into a project specification.
Use the reference values to frame the trial, then prove the complete dosing and line sequence under controlled production conditions.
Dose range
Match each SKU to a practical cylinder module and stroke window. Test the smallest and largest required dose rather than assuming the entire published family is one continuous setting.
Product behaviour
Check viscosity, temperature, particles, aeration, refill consistency and nozzle cut-off. Low-particulate sauces, oils, detergents, shampoo and lotions still need a product-and-pack trial.
Footprint and access
Confirm conveyor working height, operator access, product replenishment, cleaning clearance and the route into capping or labelling.
Application fit
Applications to assess with the real product and pack.
The following are practical shortlist routes, not blanket suitability claims.
- Personal-care liquids such as shampoo, conditioner and lotion subject to compatibility testing
- Household liquids and detergents where piston dosing and clean cut-off suit the formulation
- Low-particulate foods and oils after product-path and hygiene review
- Compact automatic projects where two heads may later be compared with a four-head configuration
Buyer questions
Questions to answer before ordering the LUDTHSP2.
These checks connect the published machine reference to the actual process.
What makes the LUDTHSP2 a compact automatic filler?
The reference platform combines a conveyor, bottle sensing, touchscreen control and two piston heads in a footprint published at approximately 1270 × 1030 × 1200 mm. “Compact” is relative to a larger inline line; access for product supply, cleaning, guarding and downstream machinery still needs to be planned.
When should the LUDTHSP2 use four heads instead of two?
Compare four heads when accepted output cannot be met with two after the real dose, viscosity, refill time, bottle indexing and downstream clearance are timed. A four-head build also needs balanced product feed and head-specific calibration.
Does the LUDTHSP2 fill every product from 5 ml to 5000 ml?
The source lists several optional volume modules covering that family of ranges. Final suitability depends on the chosen module, stroke control, product behaviour, nozzle and container. One machine setup should not be assumed to cover the whole family without change parts.
How should the published 10–30 bottles/min be checked?
Run the intended container and dose with the actual product, allow the system to reach a stable prime state, then time accepted packs after bottle indexing and discharge. Repeat at the most difficult viscosity and after a normal stop and restart.
What should be recorded during a multi-head trial?
Record each head separately, including target, measured result, sequence number, product temperature, recipe, cylinder module, nozzle and operating state. A combined average can hide one restricted or misadjusted head.
Related guidance
Continue the machine and trial review.
Automatic filling linesContinue the specification with the relevant technical guideMulti-head piston fillersContinue the specification with the relevant technical guideBalance multiple headsContinue the specification with the relevant technical guideLine integrationContinue the specification with the relevant technical guide
Check this configuration with your product and container.
Send the product, fill range, pack dimensions, target output, utilities and integration requirements for a Lancing shortlist and trial plan.